Linchuan Xu

Linchuan Xu

Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Economics, University of Manchester

I work on development economics, environmental economics, and macro-development.

I am a Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Economics at the University of Manchester. I obtained my PhD in Economics at the London School of Economics in August 2026, where I am also affiliated with STICERD.

Working Papers

The Middlemen of Development? Evidence from Labor Recruitment Agencies in China

Abstract PDF Funding · STICERD

Can profit-driven middlemen arise endogenously to correct aggregate misallocations and promote development? This paper studies the role of recruitment agencies in facilitating spatial labor reallocation in China. Using a newly constructed dataset, I find that such profit-driven labor intermediaries established branches to arbitrage away pre-existing inter-regional wage disparities. Exploiting the staggered rollout of agencies in difference-in-differences and IV designs, the analysis shows that the expansion of agency networks facilitated temporary mobility of low-skilled workers and reduced regional wage dispersion by 10%. This translates into 3% aggregate output gains by 2010, of which agencies appropriated 40% as profits. I develop a neoclassical growth model with endogenous agency dynamics, where initial misallocations create pecuniary incentives for agencies who in turn speed up regional convergence. Promoting agency workers' transition into the permanent labor force in receiving regions can generate large efficiency gains while also ensuring these gains are more widely shared.

Organizational Form and River Quality: Theory and Evidence from China

Abstract PDF

Should the government set up a separate ministry for all environmental issues, or ask all the existing decentralized and regional political organizations to have an environmental mandate? This paper studies how organizational forms incentivize political agents to internalize environment-related externalities. The theory of M-form versus U-form organizations features negative spillovers among different bureaucratic tasks, as well as spatial pollution externality that one region generates to another. I show that M-form reform may deliver better environmental performance only when spatial pollution externality is less salient and task spillover is stronger. I further argue that yardstick competition, conventionally viewed as an advantage of M-form, may exacerbate the environmental problem. I examine the empirical setting of the River Chief System in China as a shift from U-form to M-form in river management. With water quality observations from monitoring stations and environmental management information from 2015 to 2020, the empirical results highlight the heterogeneous effects of M-form reform on river quality, which are largely consistent with the theoretical predictions. I also find greater investment in water treatment infrastructure and growing instances of Coasian coordination across regions in more recent years, underscoring the importance of organizational design for environmental governance.

Empowerment or Financialization? The Gains from Financial Inclusion

Abstract PDF

Expanding credit market access is a potential source of economic empowerment and can also have equilibrium effects on wages so that the gains from financial development are widely shared. But others see credit market expansion as an unwelcome process of "financialization" with many of the gains being appropriated by financial institutions. This paper explores the consequences of financial sector expansion for profits, wages and entrepreneurial activity using a calibrated general equilibrium model with financial frictions, endogenous default, and wealth inequality. The model examines how the surplus created in the real economy by expanding financial markets is shared between borrowers, lenders, and workers. We show that competition and the contracting environment are important determinants of the gains from financial inclusion.

Organizational Purpose and the Dynamics of Motivation

Abstract PDF

This paper builds a framework for understanding the dynamics of motivation and the missions adopted by profit-maximizing firms. The approach is useful for thinking about the dynamic consequences of adopting missions such as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) or Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) goals. By embedding these ideas in a model of cultural evolution via workplace socialization, we explore when, in the long run, such goals can become consistent with profit-maximization even if they involve pecuniary costs. The incentives of a firm's owners can be important, with more patient and mission-oriented ownership likely to make a mission sustainable in the long run. However, we show that there is the possibility of hysteresis, whereby how a firm behaves in its early years can have long-run consequences that are robust to subsequent changes of ownership. Throughout the paper we focus on cases where mission choice is voluntary, but we also discuss the case for regulations that impose requirements to adopt such missions at the firm level.

The Ecological Inequality Trap

Abstract Draft available upon request

This paper develops a theory of biological resource extraction, where wealth inequality jointly evolves with ecological dynamics. It features an equilibrium ecological inequality trap where the rich operate capital-intensive technology to extract high-value resources while the poor rely on labor-intensive capture of alternative resources. When the initial wealth distribution is highly unequal, the laissez-faire economy falls into this trap while a constrained social planner reaches an egalitarian steady state, by transiently suppressing the rich's resource and conserving the poor's. The framework is applied to Lake Victoria, where the invasive Nile perch was introduced in the 1960s to commercialize the fishing industry but caused severe biodiversity loss of native species. The results highlight the efficiency–equity tradeoff of biodiversity conservation policies central to the current debate: one-sided protection of certain species may work against the economic interests of those who depend on them, even in the long run.

Selected Work in Progress

Making EV Transition Work in India

Abstract Draft available upon request Funding · IGC

How can governments facilitate electric vehicle (EV) adoption in developing countries? We construct a novel and comprehensive dataset for India covering vehicle registrations, government policies, and charging infrastructure rollout to answer this question. Our estimates from a structural model of vehicle demand suggest that a 10% purchase subsidy raises EV registrations by 13% for two-wheelers and 21% for four-wheelers. Charging station deployment is more effective at raising EV adoption in areas with greater power grid capacity. We evaluate the impact of prioritizing two-wheelers in the recent policy debate in India. In a budget-neutral counterfactual, reallocating existing state level four-wheeler subsidies to two-wheelers raises aggregate EV adoption by 5.5% while extending the reach of subsidies to more lower-income households.

Teaching

University of Manchester

ECON60022Development Microeconomics2026–now

LSE (Teaching Fellow/GTA in Economics & Public Policy)

EC428Development and Growth2023–26
PP440Micro and Macro Economics for Public Policy2024–25
PP450Public Organization: Theory and Practice2022–24
EC411Microeconomics2022–23
EC201Microeconomic Principles I2021–22

Essays

Trends in Economic Inequality in India